Connect with us

NOW TRENDING

Could the Polestar 3 Return as a Volvo in the U.S.?

Published

on

The Polestar 3 could reportedly survive in the U.S. under a Volvo badge, thanks to its shared platform, software and production at Volvo’s South Carolina factory.

The future of the Polestar 3 in the United States may not be over after all. Although the electric SUV is expected to disappear from the U.S. market following new federal connected vehicle regulations, its close relationship with the Volvo EX90 has sparked speculation that the model could eventually return wearing Volvo badges.

Since both vehicles share key technology and are built at Volvo’s manufacturing plant in South Carolina, a rebadged version could allow the company to continue offering the vehicle in the U.S. while keeping production running.

The Polestar 3 shares its platform and production facility with the Volvo EX90.

Why the Polestar 3 could become a Volvo

The Polestar 3 and Volvo EX90 are closely related. Both electric SUVs share the same architecture, core software, battery technology and major mechanical components, while production for both models takes place at Volvo’s factory in Ridgeville, South Carolina.

Unlike Polestar, Volvo received approval to continue selling its vehicles in the United States under the latest connected vehicle regulations. That distinction has fueled speculation that Volvo could introduce a version of the Polestar 3 under its own brand if market conditions require it.

Such a move would also help maximize production at the South Carolina facility while reducing the financial impact of Polestar’s exit from the U.S. market.

Shared technology could simplify a transition

From a technical perspective, converting the Polestar 3 into a Volvo model would require relatively few changes. Aside from exterior branding and a handful of styling details, the two SUVs already share most of their engineering.

If such a strategy were approved, the model could potentially arrive as a new Volvo SUV for the 2028 model year, allowing Volvo to expand its electric lineup while preserving manufacturing jobs in the United States.

Both electric SUVs share key hardware, software and manufacturing in South Carolina.

Nothing has been confirmed

At this stage, neither Volvo nor Polestar has confirmed any plans to rebadge the Polestar 3 for the U.S. market. The possibility remains purely speculative, and the final outcome could depend on future regulatory decisions as well as the long-term strategy of both brands.

If no alternative solution emerges, Polestar may eventually relocate production of the 3 outside the United States after its expected departure from the American market.

The future of the Polestar 3 in the U.S. remains uncertain as regulations continue to evolve.

Even without official confirmation, the close technical relationship between the Polestar 3 and the Volvo EX90 makes the idea of a rebadged model one of the most logical scenarios. Whether Volvo ultimately takes that step or not, the decision could play an important role in the future of electric vehicle production at its South Carolina plant and in preserving consumer choice in the U.S. EV market.

NOW TRENDING

Tesla Cybercab Gets September 3 Austin Launch Date

Published

on

Tesla will officially launch its steering-wheel-free Cybercab in Austin on September 3, adding the two-seat robotaxi to an existing autonomous fleet.

Tesla has officially set September 3, 2026 as the launch date for the Cybercab in Austin, Texas.

The two-seat autonomous vehicle has no steering wheel or pedals and is designed specifically for Tesla’s robotaxi service. The launch will initially be limited to selected guests rather than opening the vehicle to everyone.

Tesla prepares a controlled Cybercab launch

The September 3 event will be a tightly controlled launch, with Tesla sending invitations to selected riders and guests.

Some invitees previously completed Robotaxi trips between August 17 and 23, while others received exclusive-access invitations directly from Tesla.

Tesla will officially launch the Cybercab in Austin on September 3, 2026.

Guests must be at least 21 years old and will need to present identification at the event.

That suggests Tesla is treating the September launch as a curated demonstration rather than a large public rollout.

The company already operates autonomous Model Y Robotaxis in limited areas of Austin, Dallas, Houston, Miami, Orlando, and Tampa, meaning the Cybercab will be joining an existing service rather than creating Tesla’s robotaxi network from scratch.

Two seats, no steering wheel, no pedals

The Cybercab is fundamentally different from Tesla’s other vehicles.

The compact robotaxi has two seats and eliminates the traditional controls that would allow a human driver to take over.

The Cybercab uses a two-seat cabin with no steering wheel or conventional pedals.

That means every mile depends entirely on Tesla’s autonomous-driving software.

The vehicle uses Tesla’s AI4 computer platform for its Full Self-Driving system. Future AI4.5 and AI5 hardware is already part of Tesla’s longer-term roadmap, but the initial Cybercab production vehicles in Austin will use AI4.

The absence of manual controls also creates additional regulatory and safety considerations because passengers cannot simply take control if something goes wrong.

Cybercab enters an existing robotaxi network

Tesla first demonstrated the Cybercab concept publicly in October 2024, when attendees were able to experience autonomous rides on a closed course in California.

Since then, the company has continued testing the production vehicle.

Tesla has been testing Cybercab ahead of its Austin launch, including employee rides and additional autonomous-road testing.

Employee rides in Cybercab began in July 2026 as Tesla moved closer to commercial deployment.

The September 3 launch should therefore be viewed as another step in a gradual rollout rather than an immediate mass-market launch.

Tesla still faces questions surrounding regulations, safety validation, and how quickly customers will actually gain access to the new vehicle.

For now, the Tesla Cybercab is set to make its formal Austin debut on September 3. The launch will provide Tesla with another opportunity to demonstrate its driverless technology while bringing a purpose-built, steering-wheel-free robotaxi into its growing autonomous fleet.

Continue Reading

NOW TRENDING

2027 Mitsubishi Pajero Returns With Body-on-Frame Platform

Published

on

Mitsubishi will unveil the fifth-generation Pajero on September 2, bringing back body-on-frame construction, S-AWC, and a tougher off-road focus.

Mitsubishi is bringing back the Pajero with a major change in philosophy. The fifth-generation SUV will make its global debut on September 2, 2026, and will return to a body-on-frame architecture aimed at giving it significantly stronger off-road credentials.

The new SUV will also use Mitsubishi’s Super All-Wheel Control (S-AWC) system, while hybrid power remains one of the major unanswered questions ahead of its reveal.

The Pajero returns to a body-on-frame chassis

The biggest mechanical change is the move away from the unibody construction used by the previous-generation Pajero.

The new model will use a ladder-frame chassis, putting Mitsubishi back into the same fundamental territory as other traditional off-road SUVs.

The new Mitsubishi Pajero will return with body-on-frame construction for its fifth generation.

The September 2 event is now confirmed as the vehicle’s global premiere.

Mitsubishi has released several teaser images, but the company has not yet revealed the full dimensions, trim lineup, or interior.

The new architecture could allow the Pajero to compete more directly with rugged SUVs such as the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado.

S-AWC brings proven Mitsubishi technology

The new Pajero will also feature Super All-Wheel Control, Mitsubishi’s integrated system for managing torque, braking, and vehicle stability across different surfaces.

S-AWC first appeared on the Lancer Evolution X and is now used on the Triton pickup, giving Mitsubishi an established system for the new SUV.

Super All-Wheel Control will give the new Pajero advanced torque and stability management for on- and off-road driving.

Regional reports have suggested that S-AWC could be paired with Mitsubishi’s Super Select 4WD-II system.

That combination could potentially provide multiple drive configurations and low-range capability, although Mitsubishi has not officially confirmed the pairing yet.

A more extreme Pajero Ralliart version has also been rumored, which would push the SUV further toward serious off-road competition.

Hybrid power remains the big unknown

Mitsubishi has hinted at electrified versions of the new Pajero, but the company has not yet disclosed the battery size, electric range, or specific engine combinations.

A key question is whether the SUV will use a hybrid system derived from the hardware and architecture shared with the Triton.

Hybrid power is expected to play a role in the new Pajero lineup, although Mitsubishi has not revealed the technical details.

For now, the powertrain lineup remains one of the biggest unknowns ahead of the September reveal.

Mitsubishi’s broader plans could also include a Montero-badged version for North America, although that possibility has not been finalized.

Pajero could become a wider SUV family

The return of the Pajero may represent more than the arrival of a single flagship SUV.

Mitsubishi is reportedly considering smaller Pajero variants with hybrid technology for the 2028-to-2030 period, potentially turning the nameplate into a broader family of SUVs.

That would give Mitsubishi a way to compete across multiple segments rather than relying on one large off-road model.

For now, attention is firmly on September 2, when the new Pajero will finally be revealed in full.

The 2027 Mitsubishi Pajero represents a major return to Mitsubishi’s off-road roots, combining body-on-frame construction with S-AWC and a potentially electrified powertrain strategy.

Continue Reading

RACING

Hamilton Questions Ferrari’s Team Orders After Zandvoort

Published

on

Lewis Hamilton believes Ferrari should have used team orders at Zandvoort, arguing that Charles Leclerc cost him valuable time during the Dutch Grand Prix.

Hamilton wanted Ferrari to act

Hamilton moved up to fifth after overtaking Oscar Piastri on lap 35. He then found himself behind a slower Leclerc, which prevented him from maintaining his progress.

Lewis Hamilton became frustrated after getting stuck behind Charles Leclerc during the Dutch Grand Prix.

The Ferrari driver eventually complained over the radio, sarcastically criticizing the amount of time being lost.

Leclerc remained ahead until he made his pit stop on lap 43, finally freeing Hamilton to continue his recovery.

Hamilton later compared Ferrari’s approach with Mercedes, which instructed George Russell to give second place to Kimi Antonelli with seven laps remaining.

Mercedes’ decision influenced Hamilton’s frustration

Mercedes made the decision because Antonelli had significantly fresher tires and could potentially challenge Lando Norris for the lead.

Although Norris ultimately won, both Mercedes drivers accepted the decision and finished second and third.

Hamilton pointed to Mercedes’ decision to swap Russell and Antonelli as an example of more effective team management.

Hamilton believes Ferrari could have acted similarly when Leclerc was slowing his progress.

He said he wants to win and finds it difficult when he sees another team making an immediate strategic decision while Ferrari does not react in the same way.

Hamilton also said he intends to discuss the matter with Ferrari when he returns to the team.

Lost time behind Leclerc hurt Hamilton’s podium hopes

Hamilton eventually had a chance to fight Russell for third place, but a late Virtual Safety Car made the opportunity even harder.

The British driver said he was getting close to the Mercedes when the VSC was deployed on lap 70.

Hamilton believes the time lost behind Leclerc ultimately reduced his chances of challenging Russell for the final podium position.

He also pointed to Ferrari’s lack of straight-line speed.

Hamilton estimated Ferrari was losing around four tenths of a second per lap on the straights compared with Mercedes and McLaren.

That made overtaking particularly difficult and increased the importance of avoiding traffic.

Hamilton wants more engine performance from Ferrari

Despite his criticism, Hamilton praised Ferrari for bringing an upgrade to Zandvoort.

The seven-time world champion believes the team is moving closer to Mercedes, but he also thinks Ferrari must address its power deficit.

Hamilton praised Ferrari’s latest upgrade but believes the team still needs more engine performance to challenge Mercedes.

According to Hamilton, Ferrari has spent much of the season giving away performance on the straights.

He believes finding additional engine power is essential if Ferrari wants to close the gap and fight Mercedes consistently.

For Lewis Hamilton Ferrari, Zandvoort therefore produced a mixed result. The fourth-place finish was solid, but Hamilton believes Ferrari’s handling of team orders and its remaining power deficit prevented an even stronger result.

Continue Reading

Archives

Browse Categories

Tag Cloud

Trending