Connect with us

RACING

Colapinto Explains Alpine’s Pace Problem After Miami

Published

on

Franco Colapinto says Alpine’s performance became difficult to understand after the winter tests, but a new chassis, better energy management, and deeper analysis helped him recover his pace after Miami.

Franco Colapinto believes he finally understood what had been holding him back at Alpine earlier in the 2026 Formula 1 season.

The Argentine driver felt very strong during the winter tests in Bahrain. However, his pace dropped once Alpine moved to two cars for the opening races. The problem was difficult to identify because the car still felt comfortable from the cockpit.

Since the Miami Grand Prix, Colapinto has made clear progress. He has scored points in five races and finished ahead of teammate Pierre Gasly four times on Sundays.

Alpine struggled to explain the early-season drop

Colapinto said the biggest problem was not a loss of confidence in the car. Instead, the lap times simply did not match his expectations.

He felt competitive while driving, but the stopwatch told a different story.

Franco Colapinto struggled to understand why his Alpine pace dropped after the winter tests.

That made the opening races especially difficult to analyze.

For a driver, understanding why performance changes is crucial. Colapinto admitted that he often could not explain why he was losing time despite feeling comfortable behind the wheel.

He described that uncertainty as one of the most difficult aspects of the early part of the season.

A new chassis helped Colapinto find more pace

Alpine gave Colapinto a new, lighter chassis in Miami. The Argentine does not believe that necessarily means the previous chassis was defective.

Instead, he said it was difficult to separate the effect of the chassis from the other changes Alpine was making.

Alpine introduced a new lighter chassis for Colapinto in Miami as part of a broader package of changes.

The team also introduced a larger development package around the same period.

According to Colapinto, once the complete package was installed, the missing performance began to return. He estimated that the changes eliminated around half a tenth of a second per corner.

He also acknowledged that it is difficult to identify one single cause when several parts of the car and setup change at the same time.

Better energy management became another key

The April break gave Colapinto and his engineers additional time to study the data.

One of the most important areas they analyzed was energy management, which has become a critical part of Formula 1 under the 2026 regulations.

Colapinto says improved energy management has helped Alpine become more consistent during the 2026 season.

Colapinto pointed to Japan as an example of how much performance could be lost through small differences in energy deployment.

He said he once lost around four tenths of a second from one lap to another simply because energy was used differently or because he changed how he accelerated out of the final corner.

The team has since improved its consistency in that area.

Colapinto also admitted that his own performance was inconsistent during the Japanese weekend. Those mistakes provided additional lessons that helped him improve later in the season.

Colapinto is now closer to Gasly

The combination of the new chassis, Alpine’s upgrades, improved energy management, and additional preparation time has helped Colapinto close the gap to Gasly.

The Argentine now regularly fights his teammate and has produced stronger results since Miami.

Alpine still faces a development deficit compared with Racing Bulls, however. The French team is therefore placing significant expectations on its next major upgrade package for Zandvoort.

The objective is clear: improve the car, maintain Colapinto’s progress, and give Alpine a stronger chance of challenging its rivals through the second half of the 2026 season.

RACING

Ferrari Admits It Still Lacks “Pure Power” Against Mercedes

Published

on

Fred Vasseur says Ferrari’s second engine upgrade has not closed the gap to Mercedes, with outright power still the Scuderia’s biggest weakness.

Ferrari’s latest engine upgrade has improved its performance, but it has not been enough to close the gap to Mercedes.

Team principal Fred Vasseur admits the Scuderia still lacks outright engine power, particularly at circuits such as Monza where straight-line performance is crucial.

Ferrari Could Not Match Mercedes Power

Ferrari introduced its second ADUO power-unit upgrade at Monza after the first update debuted in Austria.

However, Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton qualified only fourth and fifth, while Ferrari-powered Haas driver Oliver Bearman was around 5.6 km/h slower in top speed than the Mercedes benchmark.

Ferrari introduced its second ADUO engine upgrade at Monza but remained behind Mercedes on straight-line performance.

Vasseur said Ferrari never expected the upgrades to completely eliminate the deficit.

The goal was instead to make smaller gains, with even a few additional horsepower potentially making a difference in an extremely competitive midfield.

Energy Deployment Is Not the Main Problem

Ferrari has experimented with electrical energy deployment to compensate for its lack of combustion power.

But Vasseur insists that this is not the fundamental issue.

Ferrari has used energy deployment strategies to offset some of its engine deficit, but Vasseur says the underlying issue is outright power.

According to Vasseur, moving energy around the lap only creates a trade-off elsewhere.

The real problem, he says, is simply not having enough pure power.

That deficit becomes even more visible at Monza because of the circuit’s long straights.

Budget Cap Makes Engine Development Difficult

Vasseur also highlighted the difficulty of developing a Formula 1 engine under the cost cap.

Engine components require long lead times, meaning a manufacturer cannot simply make a rapid technical change and immediately produce new power units.

Ferrari says the F1 cost cap and long component lead times make rapid engine development particularly difficult.

Ferrari therefore chose to make smaller improvements with its ADUO opportunities rather than expecting either upgrade to transform its position against Mercedes.

The team is now looking ahead to 2027, when Ferrari will have another opportunity to improve its power unit.

For Ferrari engine power, the conclusion from Monza is clear: the Scuderia has made progress, but Mercedes remains ahead where it matters most.

Ferrari’s constructors’ championship deficit has also grown from 87 to 122 points, while Hamilton now trails in the drivers’ standings by 76 points.

Continue Reading

RACING

Monza Turned F1 Into an Oval-Style Slipstream Battle

Published

on

The Italian Grand Prix delivered the most extreme example yet of F1’s 2026 “yo-yo” racing, with drivers trapped in groups by slipstream and battery management.

The Monza F1 2026 race may be remembered as the clearest example yet of how the new regulations are changing the way Grand Prix races unfold.

The combination of huge slipstream effects and limited electrical energy created a race where drivers could overtake easily, but then struggled to pull away.

Cars Became Trapped in Groups

The phenomenon has been dubbed “yo-yo racing.”

A driver can use extra battery power to make an overtaking move, only to lose that position again on the next straight after running out of energy.

Drivers repeatedly exchanged positions at Monza because battery deployment and the slipstream made it difficult to escape.

Max Verstappen experienced the problem directly.

Despite lacking the engine performance to seriously challenge Mercedes, the Red Bull driver was able to remain close to George Russell because the powerful tow reduced the advantage of the Mercedes.

Verstappen said defending became extremely difficult once another driver had access to the overtaking boost.

Even Faster Cars Struggled to Escape

The same pattern affected several other groups.

Oscar Piastri and Lewis Hamilton formed one battle, while Lando Norris and Pierre Gasly found themselves locked together.

McLaren team principal Andrea Stella noted that the regulations make it particularly difficult for a faster car to complete an overtake and then immediately pull away.

McLaren and Ferrari both struggled to create gaps because the slipstream and battery deployment neutralized some pace differences.

Ferrari team principal Fred Vasseur described the main problem as straight-line speed and overtaking.

His drivers could use their battery to attack another car, but doing so left them vulnerable on the following straight.

The Slipstream Could Be Worth Half a Second

According to Stella, the combined effect of the slipstream and battery deployment could create a difference of up to half a second per lap.

A car behind could force the driver ahead to spend additional electrical energy defending, which then affected the next section of the lap.

Battery deployment became one of the most important strategic factors at the Italian Grand Prix.

That made energy management the dominant issue for drivers and engineers throughout the weekend.

Stella described Monza as one of the busiest races of the year from a strategic perspective because teams had to constantly optimize both setup and energy usage.

Antonelli Was the Exception

There was one major exception to the group-racing pattern.

Andrea Kimi Antonelli started from 19th and eventually won the race, breaking away from the traffic after an impressive early recovery.

He reached sixth after the lap-six restart before the later strategy allowed him to fight for the victory.

For the Monza F1 2026 weekend, that combination of slipstream, battery management, and overtaking could make the Italian Grand Prix one of the defining races of the new technical era.

Continue Reading

RACING

Honda Promises a “Big Step” for 2027

Published

on

Honda expects a major power-unit upgrade for Aston Martin in 2027, but admits it may still not be enough to fully close the gap to its rivals.

Honda knows it still has ground to recover.

After a difficult Italian Grand Prix at Monza, the Japanese manufacturer confirmed that its next major engine development is being targeted for the start of the 2027 season.

Honda Admits the Gap Remains

Honda chief engineer Shintaro Orihara says the manufacturer has a clear development roadmap and knows where it currently stands compared with its rivals.

The next major step is planned for the opening race of 2027.

Honda plans a major power-unit development for Aston Martin ahead of the 2027 Formula 1 season.

However, Honda is refusing to guarantee that the upgrade will completely close the gap.

Orihara admitted that reaching the level of the leading manufacturers by the first race of next season will be difficult.

No Major Honda Upgrade Left for 2026

Honda also confirmed that there will be no further major power-unit development during the rest of 2026.

The manufacturer will instead concentrate on calibration work and drivability improvements.

Honda will focus on optimizing its existing power unit for the remainder of the 2026 season.

The latest development introduced at Zandvoort focused on the internal-combustion engine and delivered additional performance, but also created unexpected drivability problems.

Honda subsequently introduced new calibrations and countermeasures at Monza after positive results in testing at Sakura.

Monza Exposed Aston Martin’s Weaknesses

Monza highlighted the areas where Honda still needs to improve.

Fernando Alonso pointed to engine performance, straight-line speed, and acceleration among Aston Martin’s biggest problems during the weekend.

Fernando Alonso highlighted power and straight-line speed as major weaknesses for Aston Martin at Monza.

Honda believes the countermeasures introduced in Italy improved drivability and received positive feedback from its drivers.

That progress could be important at circuits where outright engine power is less decisive.

For Honda 2027 F1 engine development, however, the objective is much bigger: close the remaining performance gap and give Aston Martin a genuinely competitive power unit.

Honda knows where it wants to go. The question is whether its next major step will be enough to get there.

Continue Reading

Archives

Browse Categories

Tag Cloud

Trending